blog

Inside, wide-eyed

A weblog on digital civil rights, Free Software and Access to Knowledge.

Limit entries displayed: [ 2 ] [ 4 ] [ 6 ] [ 8 ]

Absurd WIPO quotes (2): Sorry, we don't have internet access

Here's another gem from the WIPO meetings on a Development Agenda, which followed the proposal of 14 developing countries (the "Friends of Development") for WIPO to steer away from bluntly foisting IMP maximalism upon everyone, in serfdom to rich-country rightsholders.

This time, it's not the quote that is absurd, but rather the text it refers to. At the first IIM in April 2005, the US had made a counterproposal. It tried to appease calls for a structural reform of WIPO by setting up a website. This website should be a place where those needing a copyright or patent licence could meet the rich-country rightsholders, and beg to them for it. The US considered that in this way, WIPO would take development concerns sufficiently into account.

That might have been true, had there not been those pesky have-nots. Morocco, speaking for the African countries, reminded the US (I'm quoting from the protocols, p. 18):

However, the African Group had some reservations regarding the
conceptual basis of the US proposal. For the African Group, the US
proposal assumed, as a pre-established fact, the existence and the
availability of infrastructures enabling access to the Internet in all
countries.  The Delegation pointed out that, due to the digital divide,
not all countries had the same facilities with respect to the Internet
access [...]

In clear: A website might be all well and good, but sorry, some of us don't have internet connectivity.

So much for the very valuable and thoughtful proposal by the honorable delegation of the United States. 



Absurd WIPO quotes (1)

Though I really shouldn't be blogging, I can't help it (this might provide a hint as to why).

Currently, I am evaluating tons of WIPO papers from the first round of the Development Agenda debate (2005) for my master's thesis. Some (actually most) of these have some amazing soundbites. If you think about them for a minute, they make your head spin with the level of ignorance, bad faith and cynicism that's behind them.

So I decided to start a little series for the next few days, supplying you, my faithful readers, with fine examples of how caringly the governments of this world dedicate their attention to a balanced system of intellectual monopoly powers (sometimes erroneously called "intellectual property"). 

The first one for today is from Mexico in April 2005.

 The lack of knowledge of the system on the part of the population is 
commonly observed and, in some cases, the population considers the
failure to observe the system or infringements thereof as conduct which
cannot be sanctioned or is socially acceptable; for this sector the
benefits derived from the intellectual property system and the use of
the system as a development factor are completely alien. Lack of
awareness of the system has become a cause of inefficiency as well as an
obstacle to development. 

The sanction of conduct which infringes intellectual property is of no use,
if it is not complemented by appropriate dissemination and understanding of
the system. In addition, ignorance and the failure to observe the system lead
to the formation of criminal groups, on occasions of a cross border nature and
linked to other unlawful activities such as money laundering.

In their entire proposal, Mexico totally ignores that monopolies on knowledge are not the natural state of affairs. Instead, they propose that WIPO should aggressively indoctrinate the populations of developing countries, to foster their belief in a Most Holy IMP system.

The link to organised crime is especially elegant.


[ RSS Feed ]

Right menu

Fellow Events

<< Luglio 2008 >>
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 
Selected Day Today


FSFE Card


DRM.info
© FSFE