ciaran
|
Thursday 03 April 2008
|
about:
ooxml
So, FSFE
is concerned
about the ISO process, but the ISO process is not over, and the
ISO process is not the only process. First, ISO endorsement does
not automatically lead to endorsement by national governments.
Second, there are still two months during which the ISO votes can be
contested - and there are already a lot of allegations of voting
irregularities.
The national level
Sometime in the future, separate to the ISO vote, each country will
make its own decision to accept/reject the ODF and OOXML standards.
Many countries have already accepted ODF.
Voting irregularities
OOXML needed 22 votes out of 32 to be approved. It got 24 because a
lot of countries changed their vote in the last few days. Now there
are numerous complaints about those votes. If 3 of those
"approve" were changed back to "disapprove" in
the next two months, then OOXML would be denied ISO certification.
UPDATE: Computerworld is carrying an article saying that the European Commission started investigating Microsoft's participation in February, and this story is also on CNet.
Noooxml.org also have
a page of
irregularities, and more stories will surely appear on Groklaw.
Related press releases
And, for what it's worth, here's a list of some press releases from
organisations who were also against OOXML.
--
Ciarán O'Riordan,
Support free software: Join FSFE's Fellowship
